🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding the comments made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player in the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports often encourage nationalism. Some disappointment was appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three players in the world back-to-back. He is more than within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is placed number four in the world entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His top-class serve and powerful strength on each front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, improbable improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of American men winning grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that very last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a victory that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz earning plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the point of agony. When he finally did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and never especially seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States not produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz told a journalist in June of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly unlikely for all other players. {