🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a misguided view of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" policies represent an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a serious misreading of the reality. The true danger facing the EU is not cultural but technological and economic lag.

A Glaring Economic Divide Between Europe and the US

Statistics reveal a stark contrast. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, while a paltry 13.5% increase for the EU. Over this period, EU GDP per capita fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Today, roughly half of the world’s 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Question

This widening economic gap is driven by stronger productivity growth in the US, fueled by technological innovation and better use of resources. The scene of world technology dominance is overwhelmingly American. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at over ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity prompts a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does the EU stand? Most analysts concede it is essentially a contest between two involving the United States and China, with European nations starting at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic system for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hamper European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has eroded its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, there are causes for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of major changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support much higher levels of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: skilled human capital, excellent education systems, and world-class labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations could unleash a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly boost economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now faces a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. However, if it fails to take decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.